Elon Musk and former Fb safety chief took to Twitter

• Elon Musk argued on Twitter with former Fb safety chief over ‘Twitter Recordsdata half two’.
• Alex Stamos tweeted “Musk fired the lawyer” who would inform him what would occur if non-employees had entry to customers’ DMs.
• Musk responded that Stamos operates “a propaganda platform”, after telling Musk to be clear.

Elon Musk and former Fb safety chief Alex Stamos argued on Twitter after the platform posted “Twitter Recordsdata half two”.

On Thursday, conservative columnist Bari Weiss tweeted the last thread of “Recordsdata”, an article on “Secret Twitter Blacklists”. The the “investigation” revealed that Twitter workers “blacklist, block disfavored tweets from trending, and actively restrict the visibility of complete accounts and even trending subjects, all in secret, with out letting customers know,” Weiss tweeted.

Journalist Matt Taibbi tweeted the first part of the “Twitter Recordsdata” final week, which Musk described as inner communications that may reveal that Twitter tried to censor free speech on the platform.

Weiss’ tweet thread on Thursday confirmed the inner Twitter profile of the Libs of TikTok account, which Weiss mentioned “has reached this degree of evaluate”, a sidebar that included the account’s direct messages was seen, which which has precipitated concern amongst Twitter customers like Stamos.

Abraham Gutman, well being reporter for the Philadelphia Inquirer, tweeted a screenshot of Weiss’ tweet on Libs of TikTok, and tweeted “.@elonmusk, sure or no – do Weiss and Taibbi have entry to customers’ DMs? Can be good to get a transparent clarification on this display screen and a sure/no reply to this straightforward query.

Stamos retweeted Gutman’s tweet and mentioned, “Musk fired the legal professional to inform him what would occur if Weiss or Taibbi clicked that button.”

—Alex Stamos (@alexstamos) December 9, 2022

Musk confirmed on Tuesday that he fired Twitter’s deputy basic counsel, James Baker, “in mild of issues about Baker’s attainable function in suppressing data materials to public dialogue,” in reference to the primary publication of the “Twitter Recordsdata”.

At the beginning of Musk’s takeover of Twitter, he fired chief authorized officer Vijaya Gadde, who was behind the social media platform’s choice to ban former President Donald Trump after the US insurgency. January 6, 2021 on the Capitol.

“I hope that button would not actually work for them; Twitter has performed loads of work on inner entry controls,” Stamos tweeted in Weiss’ pictures. “If these two got DM entry, I assume it’s, at a minimal, a reportable safety incident to the FTC.”

Weiss additionally shared pictures of laptop screens displaying the corporate’s inner perspective on conservative accounts like Dan Bongino and Charlie Kirk, who she mentioned have been focused by blacklisting and “shadow banning.” from Twitter – the observe of limiting the visibility of a tweet.

However Ella Irwin, the brand new head of belief and security at Twitter, specified in an answer to senior IT and cybersecurity reporter Tom McKay that the screenshots have been his.

“For safety causes the requested screenshots got here from me so we are able to guarantee no PII has been uncovered,” Irwin tweeted. “We did not give journalists that entry and no, journalists weren’t accessing customers’ DMs.”

Musk replied that Weiss’ thread “clearly describes the principles being enforced in opposition to the fitting, however not in opposition to the left.” Stamos responded that Musk ought to “present the mandatory transparency for out of doors teams to confirm this assertion.”

“You’re working a propaganda platform”, Musk tweeted back in Stamos.

Stamos tweeted that he was the target of “a wave of actually badly focused racist and anti-Semitic slurs from” Musk’s “posse,” following Musk’s response.

Taibbi’s first publish confirmed that workers debated the censorship of the New York Publish story on Hunter Biden’s laptop computer throughout Joe Biden’s 2020 presidential marketing campaign. Twitter has a no-post coverage. data concerned in a hack. When the recordsdata have been launched, some Twitter workers had their private data shared.